The United Nations

The United Nations is not this noble world government. If the United States government was set up the way the UN was, Americans would not only be horrified, but would rise in arms against it. It is not a government set up by the people of the world for the people of the world. It was set up by the victors of World War II, who claimed veto rights, and gave the leftovers to the other countries. It is not a government made in the interest of the people but rather made for the interest of governments. Those same governments that the people (who support the UN) claim are corrupted. The only checks and balances in the United Nations are Money, Might, and Manipulation! The reason the United States can steer the UN even when everyone disagrees with us is because we are the richest country (money), with the strongest military ever (might), with commercial and humanitarian interest worldwide (manipulation). Not only have that, but people all over the world liked the idea of America, if not the United States itself.

The United Nation is politically impotent and misguided, but not a waste of time. Its humanitarian successes have been a beautiful thing to behold, despite being a bazaar for geo-political agendas. So why are the great-defenders of the people’s rights demanding that we go to an organization that allows governments to have a voice and not the people themselves? The same Organization that has told the United States of America five times, that we have to alter the American Constitution, and that the American people have to give up some of their constitutional rights in order to appease the world body. Below are 4 of the 5 (I cannot find the fifth one)

The United States rejected the World Court because they stated American citizens will not be allowed the rights that the US Constitution states are theirs by right of Providence and not governments, ours or the United Nation’s.

The United States rejected UN’s Declaration of Principles for the Regulation of Firearms and other UN attempts because it bans individuals from having their own weapons, or in their words, "It is not a right to possess a firearm. This was the consensus.” Once again the US Constitution Second Amendment’s Amendment II Right to Bear Arms (1791) is in the way of the United Nations.

The United States rejected the Kyoto Accords because of its bias towards the US, its vague wordings allow for manipulation of this treaty instead of set standards for all, and costliness of implementing the drastic standards instead of little, yet constant changes. See: http://www.ce.umn.edu/classes/fall02/ce3501/kyoto8.pdf

UN Ministers have already told the media that the U.S. must alter Amendment I Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, Petition (1791), because it obstructs an almost unanimous vote to ban specific advertising of tobacco products in all countries. People should be persuaded to quit smoking, not dictated.

If someone knows this one, please contact me at warbard@gmail.com